Review Request 127809: [Platform xcb] Get best icon size when he's not specified

[Martin Gräßlin]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127809/#review95152
-----------------------------------------------------------




src/platforms/xcb/kwindowsystem.cpp (lines 711 - 716)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127809/#comment64573>

    This changes the behavior of the method. Now always NETWM is preferred, even if it doesn't provide the best icon.
    
    By returning early at this point you cannot evaluate what's the best fitting size.


- Martin Gräßlin


On May 2, 2016, 4:04 p.m., Anthony Fieroni wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127809/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 2, 2016, 4:04 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, KDE Usability and Martin Gräßlin.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 362324
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362324
> 
> 
> Repository: kwindowsystem
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The api function is KWindowSystem::icon (WId win, int width=-1, int height=-1, bool scale=false) so caller must get best size not worst when width/height is not specified.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/platforms/xcb/kwindowsystem.cpp 5b7c65a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127809/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> before
>   https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/05/01/6d718ef6-26cf-4866-94d2-4ffbdfc906fe__Screenshot_20160426_232109.png
> after
>   https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2016/05/01/7dcab4ae-e451-4d43-8799-a0fcab471a3d__Screenshot_20160501_224642.png
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anthony Fieroni
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160504/75c0a562/attachment.html>