Review Request 127825: networkmanager-qt: Don't complain so much about unhandled LastSeen property

[Jan Grulich]

> On Kvě. 3, 2016, 2:30 odp., Jan Grulich wrote:
> > That doesn't make much sense to me, if you are getting that error then it means either LastSeen property was introduced in older NM version or it was backported in your distribution. I'll check that and update that NM_CHECK_VERSION accordingly.

LastSeen property was indeed introduced in NM 1.0.6 so you shouldn't get any "unhandled property LastSeen" with older NM versions. If nm-qt was build previously against older NM version and then NM got updated then you need to rebuild it of course.


- Jan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127825/#review95140
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Kvě. 3, 2016, 2:04 odp., Allen Winter wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127825/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Kvě. 3, 2016, 2:04 odp.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Jan Grulich.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 362611
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=362611
> 
> 
> Repository: networkmanager-qt
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> If compiling against NetworkManager v1.0.5 or lower you'll get zillions of debug messages about "unhandled property LastSeen".
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/accesspoint.cpp 62cbc6c 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127825/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> none. it compiles.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Allen Winter
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160503/b41ae616/attachment.html>