Solid/PowerManagement deprecation

[Martin Graesslin]

On Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:55:51 PM CET Aleix Pol wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been looking in the last days what applications and uses make our
> software stick to KDELibs4Support.
> 
> My impression is that the big missing thing is Solid/PowerManagement.
> 
> Is anyone looking into the issue?

I replaced the usage in kscreenlocker (suspend/hibernate) with new written 
code which does nice async dbus. From the start I considered that this code 
could become the base for a new lib, so it has the right licence, etc. Commit 
is at:

http://commits.kde.org/kscreenlocker/a04768901ac13985dd673bbb45f2bf98d9a52903

But overall I don't know what is really needed from a PowerManagement API.

> Should we look into un-deprecating it?

given the very sync-dbus state of the API, I would not recommend to.

Cheers
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160324/76b63149/attachment.sig>