Review Request 128161: Make epoxy optional instead of just hacking it out for Windows

[Martin Gräßlin]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128161/#review96397
-----------------------------------------------------------




CMakeLists.txt (lines 74 - 76)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128161/#comment65120>

    instead of adding a definition could you make it a configure file?


- Martin Gräßlin


On June 12, 2016, 6:55 p.m., Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128161/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 12, 2016, 6:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Marco Martin.
> 
> 
> Repository: kdeclarative
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make epoxy optional instead of just hacking it out for Windows
> 
> This allows to compile this framework e.g. on a Mac without epoxy, too, and is IMHO saner than just disabling it for Windows.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 42302da 
>   src/qmlcontrols/kquickcontrolsaddons/CMakeLists.txt 49427aa 
>   src/qmlcontrols/kquickcontrolsaddons/kquickcontrolsaddonsplugin.cpp fc9d0af 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128161/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tried it on my mac, now compiles. I have no Linux here ATM, perhaps somebody can try if it really still works with epoxy around.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christoph Cullmann
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160613/1b496ed0/attachment-0001.html>