Review Request 128085: Fix check that CPU is a valid CPU

[Rohan Garg]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128085/#review96238
-----------------------------------------------------------



Hi
Could we get a shipit on these? I'd really appreciate it if we could have these in Frameworks 5.23

- Rohan Garg


On June 3, 2016, 5:45 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128085/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 3, 2016, 5:45 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Solid.
> 
> 
> Repository: solid
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> We have a check that an devices/system/cpu/cpuN entry contains a
> processor and not just an empty socket, however it relies on somewhat
> outdated /sys files.
> 
> cpuN/cpufreq isn't guaranteed to exist as for some systems (my AMD
> processor at least).
> 
> The docs in the linux kernel imply topology/core_id should always exist,
> and should still work as a valid check that we have a populated CPU
> socket.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/solid/devices/backends/udev/udevmanager.cpp 3f3a671798e84e6d577df7c3b9b80150ac4d01fc 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128085/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Edmundson
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160606/564c34f8/attachment.html>