Review Request 126403: Get rid of QApplication dependency

[Albert Astals Cid]

> On gen. 4, 2016, 7:42 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > anyone tested this on an "affected system"?

I have not, I thought you had made it clear in the past you thought it was a bad idea since it was all supposed to be widget based anyway.


- Albert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126403/#review90522
-----------------------------------------------------------


On gen. 2, 2016, 9:57 a.m., Thomas Lübking wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126403/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated gen. 2, 2016, 9:57 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, kwin and Albert Astals Cid.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 354811
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354811
> 
> 
> Repository: kwindowsystem
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> summarized, alternative to https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126397/
> 
> NOTICE: this compiles but is otherwise *completely* untested!
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/platforms/xcb/kwindowsystem.cpp 9d28704 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126403/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> no, not the least. esp. not on the bug.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Thomas Lübking
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160104/b4f3afdf/attachment.html>