Review Request 128589: Take over maintainership; remove framework deprecation flags

[David Faure]

> On Aug. 3, 2016, 1:32 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > I think that changing maintainership is fine, I'm not convinced that the work done so far is enough to consider it up to speed.

Can you give more details about what you see as missing before the framework can be non-deprecated?


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128589/#review98030
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 2, 2016, 11:55 p.m., Alexander Potashev wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128589/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 2, 2016, 11:55 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kross
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Take over maintainership; remove framework deprecation flags
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   metainfo.yaml 28937c96ba71aecd81d3565d071fe6560ef2e68e 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128589/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alexander Potashev
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20160805/eebe2797/attachment-0001.html>