Question about goal of Windows/Mac frameworks

[Ralf Habacker]

Am 21.10.2015 um 08:14 schrieb Christoph Cullmann:
> Hi,
>
>>> Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org> hat am 20. Oktober 2015 um 19:49 geschrieben:
>>> Regarding dbus especifically, I see the problem in 2). You can bundle
>>> it, but then if it's already ran by another process the other one will
>>> have to be used, which is where the dbus mess starts.
>> There is work in progress to provide dbus installations as standalone package or
>> bundled with an application on Windows. See
>> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92080. Version 2.18 of the
>> umbrello installer [1] will have a bundled dbus-daemon providing an install
>> path limited session bus, which is separated from the main session bus. An
>> alternative will be to install a standalone dbus package [2] which can be used
>> by single KDE applications installed by a separate installers. Each KDE
>> application can be configured to use the bundled dbus or the standalone.
> whereas I think that is great news to deploy stuff that really requires dbus,
> actually, e.g. for the umbrello use case: why do I need it at all?g
The last time I build umbrello with kf5 (version 5.11) dbus was required
to run khelpcenter and open/save file dialogs and for remote control.
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/home:/rhabacker:/branches:/windows:/mingw:/win32:/KF511/openSUSE_13.1/noarch/mingw32-umbrello5-installer-2.18.99-4.1.noarch.rpm
(you may open this rpm with ark of 7zip file manager to get the installer)
Ralf

>
> Greetings
> Christoph
>