Review Request 125725: Make KCrash optional for kservice

[Christoph Cullmann]

> On Oct. 20, 2015, 1:52 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > src/kbuildsycoca/kbuildsycoca_main.cpp, line 122
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125725/diff/1/?file=411919#file411919line122>
> >
> >     Maybe it would make sense to handle it using signal() directly here, rather than just ifdef'ing KCrash?

Perhaps, but then I would have to reimplement more or less what setEmergencySaveFunction does, or? I am not sure if that makes sense, if you want crash recovery, you can have KCrash.


- Christoph


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125725/#review87135
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 20, 2015, 1:41 p.m., Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125725/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 20, 2015, 1:41 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
> 
> 
> Repository: kservice
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> kservice depends on KCrash only for kbuildsycoca.
> make this optional and link only against it, if around. Move check to kbuildsyscoca file.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 4c0f269 
>   src/kbuildsycoca/CMakeLists.txt 19bdc84 
>   src/kbuildsycoca/kbuildsycoca_main.cpp 03619cc 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125725/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Seems to compile fine without it.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Christoph Cullmann
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20151020/0b74acd7/attachment.html>