Review Request 125497: KSycoca: spot dirs from the future, and `touch` them to avoid constant ksycoca rebuilds.

[Albert Astals Cid]

> On oct. 4, 2015, 10:30 a.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Can we have a test for this? Or is it hard to re-create the conditions artificially?
> 
> David Faure wrote:
>     I don't understand your question. This RR includes an autotest.

you're right, sorry i didn't pay enough attention.


- Albert


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125497/#review86322
-----------------------------------------------------------


On oct. 4, 2015, 7:58 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125497/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated oct. 4, 2015, 7:58 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, Albert Astals Cid and Bhushan Shah.
> 
> 
> Bugs: 353036
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=353036
> 
> 
> Repository: kservice
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> BUG: 353036
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/ksycocatest.cpp c2fe0db2b07d41ff3f66485093b76de6981a18ba 
>   src/sycoca/ksycoca.cpp d5abcc4e4d241378a83f158aa6201034433ff792 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/125497/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> unit test (failed before patch, works with it).
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Faure
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20151004/2b548177/attachment.html>