Review Request 126078: [OS X] modernising the KIdleTime plugin (WIP!)

[Aleix Pol Gonzalez]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126078/#review88390
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/plugins/osx/macpoller.h (line 31)
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126078/#comment60588>

    You removed Carbon from cmake, no?
    
    I'm not sure why you're keeping both really. If IOKit is the way to go, then do it.


In fact, I'm quite sure that as is it already is broken without the #define

- Aleix Pol Gonzalez


On Nov. 15, 2015, 11:58 p.m., René J.V. Bertin wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126078/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 15, 2015, 11:58 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Software on Mac OS X and KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kidletime
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I noticed that the KIdleTime example doesn't work properly on OS X, and that the plugin for OS X still uses the deprecated Carbon-based algorithm that I already patched for KDE4.
> 
> This patch is a work-in-progress (hence the qDebugs) update to use IOKit, IORegistry and CoreServices to do idle-time calculation as it should be done, and allow simulated user activity through a "less deprecated" function.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/plugins/osx/macpoller.cpp ad9c10f 
>   src/plugins/osx/CMakeLists.txt e1b50b8 
>   src/plugins/osx/macpoller.h ef51ea5 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126078/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> On OS X 10.9 with Qt 5.5.1 and frameworks 5.16.0 .
> 
> The example now works: when I set a QTimer with interval==0, the expected wait for user input (`resumingFromIdle` signal) works. However, I am getting a `stopCatchingIdleEvents` signal which means the application waits forever, without ever getting to compare idle time to the list of timeouts.
> I haven't been able to figure out where that signal comes from, nor why this doesn't happen on Linux.
> 
> Surely I'm missing something, but what?
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> René J.V. Bertin
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20151115/f86cd4eb/attachment-0001.html>