Review Request 124143: Implement PersonsModel filtering facilities

[Martin Klapetek]

> On June 21, 2015, 8:50 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> > I'm not very fond of the customProperty().isNull method, maybe it would make sense to add a ::ProvidedKeys field we can use. Any thoughts?

Yeah, seems that would be better (::ProvidedProperties).


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124143/#review81630
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 22, 2015, 7:47 a.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124143/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 22, 2015, 7:47 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, KDEPIM and Martin Klapetek.
> 
> 
> Repository: kpeople
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Makes it possible to filter the model by the offered properties.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/CMakeLists.txt e050b8d 
>   src/backends/abstractcontact.h 69e6b6d 
>   src/backends/abstractcontact.cpp f5cd452 
>   src/personssortfilterproxymodel.h PRE-CREATION 
>   src/personssortfilterproxymodel.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt ece7e60 
>   autotests/fakecontactsource.h 53f1ef2 
>   autotests/fakecontactsource.cpp 2e12c2d 
>   autotests/persondatatests.cpp f752e5d 
>   autotests/personsmodeltest.cpp 8a467ef 
>   autotests/personsproxymodeltest.h PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/personsproxymodeltest.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/124143/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I ran the unit test until it passed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20150624/49e08869/attachment.html>