Does frameworks allow move semantics unconditionally?

[Alex Merry]

On Friday 31 July 2015 15:11:56 Alex Merry wrote:
> So when you say "move semantics", what does that encompass? You can use
> rvalue references in 2010 just fine, but someone would need to check that
> Qt detects that properly and provides appropriate overloads of various
> methods, and you may not get std::move (if you use qMove, it will degrade
> properly in std::move's absence, though).

MSDN says that std::move() *does* exist in MSVC 2010. So I think we're 
probably good to use move semantics.

Alex