Supporting MSVC2010 in ktexteditor framework

[Ivan Čukić]

> My opinion is still the same on this matter: VS2012 (aka MSVC11).

I guessed as much. Just wanted to get the ball rolling again so that
we can reach a decision, instead of just talking about it.

I also think that (while insufficient for the most fun things of
c++11) MSVC11 (VS12) is the currently sanest choice (for frameworks).

If the ball stops again, I'll consider this a decision well made. :)

Cheers,
Ivan

On 29 January 2015 at 15:52, Ivan Čukić <ivan.cukic at gmail.com> wrote:
>> My opinion is still the same on this matter: VS2012 (aka MSVC11).
>
> I guessed as much. Just wanted to get the ball rolling again so that
> we can reach a decision, instead of just talking about it.
>
> I also think that (while insufficient for the most fun things of
> c++11) MSVC11 (VS12) is the currently sanest choice.
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>
>>
>> Regards.
>> --
>> Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
>>
>> KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
>> Kde-frameworks-devel at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> KDE, ivan.cukic at kde.org, http://ivan.fomentgroup.org/
> gpg key id: 850B6F76



-- 
Cheerio,
Ivan

--
While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words
Dying to believe in what you heard
I was staring straight into the shining sun