Review Request 126474: Port QRegExp to QRegularExpression in kshorturifilter

[David Edmundson]

> On Dec. 22, 2015, 4:59 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > The patch seems straight-forward.
> > 
> > I can not find the reference that QRegularExpression is thread-safe (the most I see is 'all functions in this class are reentrant which is stated for QRegExp as well).
> > 
> > The QRegExp vs QRegularExpression situation is quite confusing, but the later should be preferred in Qt 5.x - it is faster if nothing else.

you're right docs don't mention it, but see Alex's comment on https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126455/


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126474/#review89939
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 22, 2015, 4:52 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126474/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 22, 2015, 4:52 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kio
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> A static QRegExp was used but it is not thread safe. QRegularExpression
> seems to be.
> 
> BUG: 352356
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/urifilters/shorturi/kshorturifilter.cpp 1af4768b7b5ab9d1f5af52f17170d466d854b9bb 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126474/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I ran the autotests which includes urifilter and I've run krunner which uses it extensively.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Edmundson
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20151222/0ff3f513/attachment.html>