Releasing Deprecated modules and Tier 4 Definition

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Sunday, March 16, 2014 11:43:12 David Faure wrote:
> There's a middle ground between "actively maintain" and "we made it
> completely impossible to even fix one bug".

at which point the person(s) doing the bug fixes can take on the project an 
handle releases. it is free software: people can fork and/or adopt. (i'll put 
more thoughts on this in my response to kevin's mail)

>  ... or to follow a change in ECM, or whatever.

if ECM changes 1.5 years (or whatever) after the initial KF5 release in a way 
that requires changing the build files, wouldn't that be a bug in ECM? at some 
point ECM needs to provide stability.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140317/fe3b679c/attachment.sig>