Review Request 115478: Add QFileDialog unit autotest for filters (which reveals a QPA bug)

[Kevin Ottens]

> On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:17 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> > Has the Qt patch been submitted upstream?
> 
> Dominik Haumann wrote:
>     Meanwhile yes: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,77390
> 
> Alex Merry wrote:
>     I don't think it's useful to have tests that fail because of upstream issues in the repo, at least not in such a way that it causes the testsuite as a whole to report a failure.
>     
>     My suggestion is to mark (1) as an expected failure (http://qt-project.org/doc/qt-5/qtest.html#QEXPECT_FAIL), and mark (2) as an expected failure only if the Qt version is too old.  With comments about why the failures are expected, of course.
> 
> Dominik Haumann wrote:
>     I've pushed these changes to the Qt stable branch: https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,77390
>     So if build.kde.org uses a recent enough Qt version, I'd expect this test to pass. What Qt version does build.kde.org use right now?
> 
> Alex Merry wrote:
>     It's not just build.kde.org, it's also users (or, more likely, packagers and developers).  If you know what point-release will get this fix, then just test for that.
> 
> Ben Cooksley wrote:
>     The CI system rebuilds Qt once a week.
>     The latest build log is visible at http://build.kde.org/job/qt5_master_qt5/119/consoleText - it built revision 805c735 of the qt5.git supermodule.

I agree with Alex, please adjust the test to use QEXPECT_FAIL.


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115478/#review48954
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 4, 2014, 5:07 p.m., Dominik Haumann wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115478/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 4, 2014, 5:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, Àlex Fiestas and Gregor Mi.
> 
> 
> Repository: frameworkintegration
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> The following QPA integration does not work as expected:
> 
>     QStringList nameFilterList = QStringList() << "c (*.cpp)" << "h (*.h)";
>     dialog.setNameFilters(nameFilterList);
> 
>     QString selectNameFilter("h (*.h)");
>     dialog.selectNameFilter(selectNameFilter);
> //  QCOMPARE(dialog.selectedNameFilter(), selectNameFilter); // (1) always fails, no matter what
> 
>     dialog.show();
>     QCOMPARE(dialog.selectedNameFilter(), selectNameFilter); // (2) currently also fails, Qt patch required
> 
> The problem is described in detail in:
> http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/2014-February/010691.html
> 
> 
> The Qt patches that make (2) work are as follows:
> 
> diff --git a/src/widgets/dialogs/qfiledialog.cpp b/src/widgets/dialogs/qfiledialog.cpp
> index da026d2..72b2310 100644
> --- a/src/widgets/dialogs/qfiledialog.cpp
> +++ b/src/widgets/dialogs/qfiledialog.cpp
> @@ -627,7 +627,8 @@ void QFileDialogPrivate::helperPrepareShow(QPlatformDialogHelper *)
>      options->setInitialDirectory(directory.exists() ?
>                                   QUrl::fromLocalFile(directory.absolutePath()) :
>                                   QUrl());
> -    options->setInitiallySelectedNameFilter(q->selectedNameFilter());
> +    if (options->initiallySelectedNameFilter().isEmpty())
> +        options->setInitiallySelectedNameFilter(q->selectedNameFilter());
>      if (options->initiallySelectedFiles().isEmpty())
>          options->setInitiallySelectedFiles(userSelectedFiles());
>  }
> @@ -1447,6 +1448,7 @@ void QFileDialog::selectNameFilter(const QString &filter)
>  {
>      Q_D(QFileDialog);
>      if (!d->usingWidgets()) {
> +        d->options->setInitiallySelectedNameFilter(filter);
>          d->selectNameFilter_sys(filter);
>          return;
>      }
> 
> However, the QCOMPARE in (1) is still an open issue. And no fix in sight...
> 
> Ok to commit this to frameworksintegration (and therewith make it unstable?)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/kfiledialog_unittest.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt fb58b3a 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115478/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> The attached unit test currently fails due to a bug in the Qt QPA.
> 
> With the Qt patch above, (2) in the unit test passes, so one is able to call QFileDialog::selectNameFilter().
> However, (1) remains broken.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dominik Haumann
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140304/65549837/attachment-0001.html>