Review Request 119325: Use CMAKE_INSTALL_FULL_LIBEXECDIR_KF5
Hrvoje Senjan
hrvoje.senjan at gmail.com
Thu Jul 17 10:29:03 UTC 2014
> On July 17, 2014, 10:42 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Looks good to me. Please grep for more uses of LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR in other frameworks though, they might have the same issue?
looks like there are a few more frameworks with this case. will be opening reviews for them during the day.
- Hrvoje
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119325/#review62556
-----------------------------------------------------------
On July 17, 2014, 12:25 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119325/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated July 17, 2014, 12:25 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Repository: kdesu
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> This resolves the problem of passing relative vs. absolute KF5_LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR/LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR.
> ATM kdesu does not even work due to that (suprocess.cpp change)
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/client.cpp f207122
> src/config-kdesu.h.cmake 992503d
> src/kdesud/CMakeLists.txt 45b6aa2
> src/suprocess.cpp 5c30f65
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119325/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> builds, and kdesu works
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hrvoje Senjan
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140717/1924c4a7/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list