Review Request 119257: kconfig: Fix QBasicAtomicInt being treated as int.

[David Faure]

> On July 13, 2014, 11:20 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Which version of Qt are you using? On which OS, with which compiler?
> > 
> > (I think the issue is Qt 5.2 vs 5.3, let's see...)
> 
> Andreas Xavier wrote:
>     Thank you for the quick response.
>     
>     I am using Fedora 20, linux 3.14.9, gcc 4.8.3, and Qt 5.2.  
>     
>     So I take it that if I compile Qt5.3 from source QBasicAtomicInt has the implicit constructors to/from int?

Yes. However, we advertise Qt 5.2 compatibility, so this patch should actually go in.
I just wanted to make sure this was the issue.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119257/#review62246
-----------------------------------------------------------


On July 13, 2014, 4:11 p.m., Andreas Xavier wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119257/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 13, 2014, 4:11 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Matthew Dawson.
> 
> 
> Repository: kconfig
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> While building frameworks following https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Building/Details, 
> I was unable to compile kconfig because QBasicAtomicInt is being treated as an int.  This patch fixes that problem.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/core/kconfig.cpp 14a5d39 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119257/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Compiled successfully.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Andreas Xavier
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140713/2ae8955c/attachment-0001.html>