Review Request 115292: Do Configure Checks in the Correct Language
David Narváez
david.narvaez at computer.org
Fri Jan 31 21:32:35 UTC 2014
> On Jan. 31, 2014, 6:31 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> > src/ConfigureChecks.cmake, lines 87-88
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/diff/1/?file=240431#file240431line87>
> >
> > Is this LANGUAGE stuff a cmake 3 feature, because it does not appear to exist in cmake 2.8.12
$ cmake --help-module CheckStructHasMember
CheckStructHasMember
--------------------
Check if the given struct or class has the specified member variable
::
CHECK_STRUCT_HAS_MEMBER(<struct> <member> <header> <variable>
[LANGUAGE <language>])
::
<struct> - the name of the struct or class you are interested in
<member> - the member which existence you want to check
<header> - the header(s) where the prototype should be declared
<variable> - variable to store the result
<language> - the compiler to use (C or CXX)
The following variables may be set before calling this macro to modify
the way the check is run:
::
CMAKE_REQUIRED_FLAGS = string of compile command line flags
CMAKE_REQUIRED_DEFINITIONS = list of macros to define (-DFOO=bar)
CMAKE_REQUIRED_INCLUDES = list of include directories
CMAKE_REQUIRED_LIBRARIES = list of libraries to link
Example: CHECK_STRUCT_HAS_MEMBER("struct timeval" tv_sec sys/select.h
HAVE_TIMEVAL_TV_SEC LANGUAGE C)
$ cmake --version
cmake version 2.8.12.20140128-g2dfb5
CMake suite maintained by Kitware, Inc. (kitware.com).
> On Jan. 31, 2014, 6:31 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> > src/ConfigureChecks.cmake, line 89
> > <https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/diff/1/?file=240431#file240431line89>
> >
> > This one doesn't even have an argument to LANGUAGE; but CheckPrototypeExists actually already checks using C++
Fixed locally. I was adding arguments to all calls when I noticed this one didn't need it but erased just the second argument, my bad.
- David
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/#review48694
-----------------------------------------------------------
On Jan. 24, 2014, 1:55 p.m., David Narváez wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Jan. 24, 2014, 1:55 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Alex Merry.
>
>
> Repository: kde4support
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> A recent change in ECM revealed an issue with ConfigureChecks.cmake, where the check_symbol_exist calls would use the C compiler (with CFLAGS) and the compilation would happen in C++ (with CXXFLAGS). This change ports all checks to CXX where possible.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> src/ConfigureChecks.cmake 7c8951f
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115292/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> 1. Refreshed builds for ECM and KDE4Support, both building OK
> 2. $ grep HAVE_GETADDRINFO src/config-network.h
> #define HAVE_GETADDRINFO 1
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Narváez
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140131/b3d00480/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list