Tier status of attica & kwallet

[Valentin Rusu]

On Saturday, January 25, 2014 01:49:51 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 01/24/2014 09:21 AM, Alex Merry wrote:
> > On 23/01/14 21:50, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> >> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 11:18:02 PM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >>> On 01/23/2014 08:21 AM, Valentin Rusu wrote:
> >>>> On Thursday, January 23, 2014 04:24:37 AM Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >>> Sure, the framework itself is still tier 2...but the repo also includes
> >>> kwalletd which definitely is not tier 2, and there does not appear to be
> >>> any option to control building them independently.
> >> 
> >> I'll add that option asap.
> > 
> > Is that useful?  Would anyone have any use for the library without the
> > daemon?

Once, David F. told on this mailing list that such an option would let an Qt 
application compile against KF5Walllet. The daemon is a runtime dependency.

> > 
> > Alex
> 
> Same question but in a different way - is the daemon intended to be part
> of the framework, or is just happening to share the repository?

Yes, the daemon is intented to be part of the framework. As the KWallet API 
won't work without that daemon.


-- 
Valentin Rusu
irc: valir
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140124/58eb1a9c/attachment.sig>