Review Request 115147: Fix non-X11 implementation of KPassivePopup placement

[Martin Gräßlin]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115147/#review47781
-----------------------------------------------------------



src/kpassivepopup.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115147/#comment33875>

    why is the QScreen include needed? Looks like the changes don't use it



src/kpassivepopup.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115147/#comment33874>

    is this comment still valid? QXcbWindow knows the concept of foreign windows. So maybe the code could just be simplified and the if - else completely removed?


- Martin Gräßlin


On Jan. 20, 2014, 3:03 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115147/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 20, 2014, 3:03 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: knotifications
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Fix non-X11 implementation of KPassivePopup placement
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/kpassivepopup.cpp b41cb8dc8b3372346bd12c0413bf6bfa9a6fd00d 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115147/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Builds when I comment out find_package(X11) in the CMakeLists.txt file.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Merry
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140120/1aed462d/attachment.html>