KDE Frameworks: Looking for maintainers

[Kevin Ottens]

Hello everyone,

This is a reminder that we're still looking for maintainers for our 
frameworks. Out of the 57 existing frameworks 33 have no maintainer (yes, 
that's almost 60%). I don't know about you, but I find that worrying.

The modules without maintainers are spread this way:
 - 9 are tier 1 (so depending only on Qt);
 - 7 are tier 2 (depending on Qt and a couple of tier 1);
 - 14 are tier 3 (larger dependencies)
 - 3 are tier 4 (kde4support and modules helping for platform integration).

I'd like to thanks all the people who already stepped up to become frameworks 
maintainers! And for those still hiding in the dark, here is your chance at 
providing a very critical service to our community!

If you hesitate on becoming a maintainer, feel free to get in touch with me, 
we can probably work together to find something where you'll feel at home. If 
you have a calling to become a maintainer and already have well formed tastes 
and responsibilities you'd like to take, head to the wiki and book one of the 
frameworks:
http://community.kde.org/Frameworks/List

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140113/52761059/attachment.sig>