setting SOVERSION to 5

[šumski]

On Tuesday 25 of February 2014 18:45:15 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Tuesday 25 February 2014 17:12:37 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:55:43PM +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > OK, but then the said change is either in the packaging or in our own
> > > cmake
> > > files as we'd have to drop the SOVERSION later on when our version
> > > becomes
> > > 5.0.0. So it's really a question of which is more error prone.
> > 
> > No change would be needed in the KF5 sources, SOVERSION would be set to 5
> > now and until KF6 comes along.
> 
> I'm not fond of keeping duplicated information like that... but indeed
> that's an option as well. Now I wonder though: what was Hrvoje's objection
> exactly?

After reading all replies, i guess it does makes sense to have soversion at 5 
(already). 
(i.e. it 'shouldn't' have been downgraded to 4 for first alpha - but just the 
soversion ;-), even though the soversion is kinda contained in library names)
My objection was based on that we'll have a 4.96.0 release with so.4, and then 
suddenly with 4.97.0 at 5...


Cheers,
Hrvoje

> Regards.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140225/cb0f3cd4/attachment.sig>