Review Request 115602: Rename kactivitymanagerd

[Kevin Ottens]

> On Feb. 21, 2014, 6:29 a.m., Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > I understand Ivan point of view. Now I'm wondering about something: Are we sure the situation will be the same in the future for a 5 to 6 transition? I don't think we can be 100% sure and so we might want to start versioning to be ready for that and be consistent with other similar services.
> > 
> > I wouldn't have a huge problem either way, just want to make sure we thought that through.
> 
> Ivan Čukić wrote:
>     KAMD keeps back-compatibility. Even in 5 -> 6 transition, I will want that kept.
>     
>     I still don't see a point in having two different binaries that can not be run at the same time (unlike kded, for example) and where interchanging which one was started can lead to fun things. It would have even worse consequences if those were able to be run at the same time, and use different dbus paths.
>     
>     And to reiterate, if distributions want to include this patch, and deal with the resulting problems themselves, I'm fine with that.*
>     
>     (btw, kamd/5 is more stable than kamd/4)
>     
>     * I guess it will bring me headaches, while triaging bug reports, but that I can handle (I hope :) )
>

OK, let's discard it then.


- Kevin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review50434
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 18, 2014, 9:50 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 9:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić.
> 
> 
> Repository: kactivities
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/Process.cpp a7a0507 
>   src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be 
>   src/service/CMakeLists.txt 141e9b7 
>   src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both installed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hrvoje Senjan
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140221/0ea34526/attachment-0001.html>