Review Request 115602: Rename kactivitymanagerd

[Kevin Ottens]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/#review50434
-----------------------------------------------------------


I understand Ivan point of view. Now I'm wondering about something: Are we sure the situation will be the same in the future for a 5 to 6 transition? I don't think we can be 100% sure and so we might want to start versioning to be ready for that and be consistent with other similar services.

I wouldn't have a huge problem either way, just want to make sure we thought that through.

- Kevin Ottens


On Feb. 18, 2014, 9:50 p.m., Hrvoje Senjan wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 9:50 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Ivan Čukić.
> 
> 
> Repository: kactivities
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> ...so it can co-exists with kactivities4 in the same prefix
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/Process.cpp a7a0507 
>   src/lib/core/manager_p.cpp 57f60be 
>   src/service/CMakeLists.txt 141e9b7 
>   src/service/files/kactivitymanagerd.desktop ce68a49 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115602/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Both Plasma1 and Next ran fine with this patch and withouth kactivitymanagerd(4) installed. Haven't tested the case when they are both installed.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Hrvoje Senjan
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140221/fa9e5343/attachment.html>