Review Request 115874: Fix unit tests on Windows by adding two expected failures
Alex Merry
kde at randomguy3.me.uk
Wed Feb 19 15:31:23 UTC 2014
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115874/#review50262
-----------------------------------------------------------
autotests/kdirwatch_unittest.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115874/#comment35384>
if (watch.internalMethod() == KDirWatch::QFSWatch) {
autotests/kdirwatch_unittest.cpp
<https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115874/#comment35385>
if (watch.internalMethod() == KDirWatch::QFSWatch) {
- Alex Merry
On Feb. 18, 2014, 8:16 p.m., Alexander Richardson wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115874/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 8:16 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
>
>
> Repository: kcoreaddons
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Fix unit tests on Windows by adding two expected failures
>
> KDirWatch with QFSWatch backend fails in two cases, this seems to be a
> limitation in the QFSWatch code since it works fine with the stat backend.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> autotests/kdirwatch_unittest.cpp ca9cf0361dbe1bee3b0b76942c708110b7445ad5
>
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115874/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alexander Richardson
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140219/d38d701b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list