Review Request 115526: Refactor private class member variables of KCompletionBase for readability

[David Gil Oliva]

> On Feb. 12, 2014, 7:26 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > I kind of like the m_ prefix even in Private classes, for the readability of methods in that class. But no big deal, won't veto this since Qt doesn't use m_.

I'm more a Qt-ish kind of man ;-) But I'm glad to know that there are people who think differently. I thought that it was really common to leave out the m_ prefix in d-pointer member variables.


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115526/#review49623
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 7, 2014, 12:08 a.m., David Gil Oliva wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115526/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 7, 2014, 12:08 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Repository: kcompletion
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Refactor private class member variables of KCompletionBase for readability
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/kcompletionbase.h 1c1f23f 
>   src/kcompletionbase.cpp 44d05cb 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115526/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> It builds. Tests pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Gil Oliva
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140212/2ec92891/attachment.html>