Review Request 115424: Improve kparts dependencies

[Michael Palimaka]

> On Feb. 8, 2014, 5:34 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > Looks good, but then you have 56 other frameworks where to add a if(BUILD_TESTING) around add_subdirectory(tests) and add_subdirectory(autotests) :-)

That's fine, do I need to do a review request for all of those that have just that change?


- Michael


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115424/#review49264
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 8, 2014, 5:32 p.m., Michael Palimaka wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115424/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 8, 2014, 5:32 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and David Faure.
> 
> 
> Repository: kparts
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> - QtNetwork is not used
> - QtTest is only required for tests
> - Remove transitive dependencies
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 8d7a76250a3977120f014eb735a2ef66ca5d59ea 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt d62107e51d88b0ea46be113b57c318197f3ebaa9 
>   tests/CMakeLists.txt d7bca988b59022bb0731a38a5d7e872217541810 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115424/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Inspection of source. Builds. Tests pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael Palimaka
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140208/7f22f7ce/attachment.html>