Review Request 115423: Move license information to its proper locations

[Michael Palimaka]

> On Feb. 1, 2014, 5:42 p.m., Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >

Note that the listed license, and the actual file licenses are a little bit murky in this (and most other frameworks). Here, we have some files that are LGPL-2 or later, some are LGPL-2.1 or later, and some that just say LGPL without any version or "or later" qualification.


- Michael


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115423/#review48748
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 1, 2014, 5:19 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115423/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 1, 2014, 5:19 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, Kevin Ottens and Jonathan Riddell.
> 
> 
> Repository: kimageformats
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This is a pattern I would like to apply to other frameworks.
> 
> 
> Move license information to its proper locations
> 
> The BSD license goes in the relevant CMake file, and
> COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS is removed.  README.md gets a License section
> describing the overall license of the framework, as well as a note about
> the CMake scripts.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS 4b417765f3a834ce6b0a216f6b6c0fe2d3f0bed5 
>   README.md 040e151d8a38fd2fd1583d17de4b60d2e4cc9776 
>   cmake/FindOpenEXR.cmake d69f449960a0ff27c35a532bf4492e20978d5dfe 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115423/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Merry
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140201/64bf5f60/attachment.html>