Baloo Framework - License Exception

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Tuesday 16 December 2014 14:02:18 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday, December 15, 2014 19:48:30 Ivan Čukić wrote:
> > > If we make Baloo GPL and then happen to change the database
> > > used we would have to relicense all of Baloo. That would be a lot
> > > of admin work contacting all developers.
> > 
> > I'm not advocating changing the library headers to GPL*, just not saying
> > the library is LGPL, when it can not be *used* as an LGPL library.
> 
> Ow, maybe I haven't made myself clear. Let's try again:
> 
> - If it's effectively GPL-licensed, it should not be a proper Framework
> 
> - Even if headers are marked as LGPL, it should be very clear that the
> effective license at this stage is GPL
> 
> 
> So what Ivan says. :)
 
+1

Cheers,
Martin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20141216/f4ef7cff/attachment.sig>