Breeze widget style for KF5

[Milian Wolff]

On Monday 11 August 2014 14:20:26 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> On Monday 11 of August 2014 14:08:35 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Monday 11 August 2014 13:10:39 Luigi Toscano wrote:
> > > On Monday 11 of August 2014 13:05:19 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote:
> > > > Hi Milian
> > > > 
> > > > > As someone with no clue:
> > > > > 
> > > > > a) what's the advantage of having a native widget style, compared to
> > > > > using
> > > > > QtCurve settings?
> > > > 
> > > > None, except that you need someone working on qtcurve
> > > > 
> > > > > Are there things missing / not implementable in QtCurve?
> > > > 
> > > > Everything is implemementable in QtCurve, though not via a simple text
> > > > config file. So here also, you need someone to do it.
> > > 
> > > As someone else just watching: QtCurve is a KDE project now, shouldn't
> > > this
> > > help a bit?
> > 
> > hey guys, I find this a rather strange topic for discussion. We are very
> > happy that Hugo stepped up to write a native style. Questioning why he
> > didn't use QtCurve seems absurd to me.
> 
> I find this answer a bit overracting.
> I didn't do "questioning" police-style; I asked. End of story. If you don't
> expect question, don't put "> Comments, objections, blessings, are welcome"
> at the end.

I agree. Really, I'm thankful for Hugo is doing and has done for KDE. But 
since I have no clue about styles (I even said so!) I wanted to ask what the 
advantage of a native style over a QtCurve config file are. Hugo answered 
that. So whats the deal Martin?

Bye
-- 
Milian Wolff
mail at milianw.de
http://milianw.de