Review Request 117777: Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass

[Alex Merry]

> On April 26, 2014, 8:51 a.m., Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > Would it be a good idea to start by reverting https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/116096/ ?
> 
> Alex Merry wrote:
>     So we have no unit tests? I don't really see how that would help (except in the strict sense of no unit tests => no failing unit tests).
> 
> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>     I meant considering the problem again as it was before that patch - namely doing a proper merge of the two versions. Is that what this patch does? Is it a full merge?

Yes, the first two commits merge the two versions (by reapplying all the changes you made on top of the new one). The third commit alters KSelectionProxyModel. Would it be less confusing as two reviews?


- Alex


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117777/#review56594
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 25, 2014, 7:18 p.m., Alex Merry wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117777/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 25, 2014, 7:18 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly.
> 
> 
> Repository: kitemmodels
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Make the KSelectionProxyModel unit test pass
> 
> It looks like Qt4 emitted layoutChanged in circumstances where Qt5 emits
> rowsMoved. This could be used to optimize things, but for now we just
> act the same way in either case (rebuilding the mapping).
> 
> Add a pedantic mode to modeltest.
> 
> Cherry-pick of ffd732966d1f2c632d811e8fc378a95aa1456703
> 
> This was lost when I updated ModelTest to Qt5.
> 
> Re-apply Stephen Kelly's modeltest fixes
> 
> These were lost when I replaced ModelTest with the version from Qt 5.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   autotests/CMakeLists.txt 4281fec2de1124162af623cf999db73eff705684 
>   autotests/proxymodeltestsuite/modeltest.h 4b80850d51ca068fb8ffb0a704a9f938b4dacfa9 
>   autotests/proxymodeltestsuite/modeltest.cpp 0928a3a4d78d10fcae4a5671e91e836e9fde429b 
>   src/kselectionproxymodel.cpp ea97f7a197f9181745f2979c2f7b2e5e1f0015f3 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/117777/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Unit tests now pass.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Alex Merry
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140426/48c907d3/attachment.html>