KItemModels, Solid & KJS licenses

[šumski]

On Wednesday 19 of February 2014 21:18:31 šumski wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> i've started pushing Frameworks to openSUSE Factory (i.e. next openSUSE
> release), and our legal review found some issues[1][2][3] with mentioned
> frameworks licenses.
> ...

Last items =)
KRunner and KActivities are missing COPYING(.LIB), but the 'biggest' remaining 
issue is kde4support, quote:

"The spec file states only that the package is LGPL-2.1+ licensed. Indeed, the
predominant license in the source code files does appear to be LGPL-2.1.
However, there are instances of other licenses. If this cpp code is compiled 
with the rest of the LGPL-2.1+ licensed kde4support code, it could be said 
that the resulting work must be licensed under the GPL-2.0 - this would have a 
material effect on the overall license of kdesupport4."

Should kde4support be declared as GPL-2.0?

TIA, and cheers,
Hrvoje
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20140407/89f479a0/attachment-0001.sig>