Review Request 112797: Bring back KStringHandler::naturalCompare()
Mark Gaiser
markg85 at gmail.com
Wed Sep 18 17:23:25 UTC 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112797/#review40289
-----------------------------------------------------------
Posting the same here as i just said in your other review request. (I didn't see this one)
Idea: restore naturalCompare as it was and add a "collatorNaturalCompare" that is taking the QCollator route. That way it's easily testable as well.
I think we can all agree on that, right?
- Mark Gaiser
On Sept. 18, 2013, 4:55 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112797/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Sept. 18, 2013, 4:55 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for KDE Frameworks, Frank Reininghaus and Mark Gaiser.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Apparently there's people who still want to have it. Leave it in KCoreAddons for the moment, until we decide that it can be replaced for good by QCollator.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> tier1/kcoreaddons/autotests/kstringhandlertest.cpp 93da351
> tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/text/kstringhandler.h 442b97a
> tier1/kcoreaddons/src/lib/text/kstringhandler.cpp ea3bbf5
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112797/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Builds, tests pass.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130918/47c07319/attachment.html>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list