Review Request 112702: KIO slavebase listEntry improvement and cleanups

David Faure faure at kde.org
Sun Sep 15 08:33:45 UTC 2013



> On Sept. 14, 2013, 10:45 a.m., David Faure wrote:
> > staging/kio/src/core/slavebase.h, line 23
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112702/diff/1/?file=189211#file189211line23>
> >
> >     I'm pretty sure it was included already, via one of the kio/* includes below. You can just remove this.
> 
> Mark Gaiser wrote:
>     It's odd, it (QtCreator) does underline it in red (as if it can't find it) when i remove that line. But compiling seems to be working just fine. So it's removed now.

QtCreator tends to pick up includes from /usr/include rather than from the proper place (i.e. where CMake finds them at compile time).
It's buggy (but I've even seen that with qmake, it's not even cmake-integration related)


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112702/#review40015
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 14, 2013, 10:36 p.m., Mark Gaiser wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112702/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 14, 2013, 10:36 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks and kdelibs.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch actually does two things:
> 1. A small indentation fix that this diff doesn't show properly (i can commit that as a separate commit if that's preferred)
> 2. A cleanup in how a listDir is handled. It used to be required to send a listEntry(UDSEntry, true) to indicate that the listing is completed. Then the UDSEntry was skipped. It seemed vague to me so i deprecated that function and added a new listEntry that doesn't take a bool. Now you just have to call finished() when done listing. finished() was already required otherwise KIO would blame you with warnings :)
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kioslave/file/file_unix.cpp 48bd0ba 
>   staging/kio/src/core/slavebase.h b46631e 
>   staging/kio/src/core/slavebase.cpp 2e46985 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112702/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> It compiles and runs just fine. The few tests that are there are passing though i doubt they test this case. the KIO file slave also works just fine. Compilation does give me new (expected_ deprecated errors for at least the http slave. I don't know how to test that one. It should just work fine though.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> Updated diff
>   http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/media/uploaded/files/2013/09/14/kioslave_listentry_improvement.patch
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark Gaiser
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130915/f04c5767/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list