Review Request 112479: Split Bookmarks out of kio folder into own folder in staging

David Faure faure at kde.org
Sun Sep 8 08:53:16 UTC 2013



> On Sept. 3, 2013, 12:34 p.m., David Faure wrote:
> > staging/kbookmarks/tests/CMakeLists.txt, line 9
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112479/diff/1/?file=186788#file186788line9>
> >
> >     Isn't that only for unittests?
> 
> David Edmundson wrote:
>     If this is wrong kconfigwidgets and ktextwidgets and kcompletion are also wrong.
>     
>     I've pushed as-is for now, if this is wrong, let me know and I'll check all the modules.

Ah, I confused add_test and ecm_mark_as_test. The word "test" means something different in these two things.

add_test == run this autotest when typing "make test"
ecm_mark_as_test == don't compile this program if BUILD_TESTING is false. This can indeed be applied to manual test programs too.

So you did the right thing :)


- David


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112479/#review39255
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 4, 2013, 4:59 p.m., David Edmundson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112479/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 4, 2013, 4:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Split Bookmarks out of kio folder into own folder in staging.
> 
> This is simply a splitting + moving + removing deprecated functions, I am aware it doesn't comply with a lot of other things on the frameworks checklist yet.
> 
> It is possible to split kbookmarks into core + gui. Do we want that?
> 
> We also need to decide what tier this is aiming for. I think 3 as we use parts of KIO.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   kio/CMakeLists.txt 167f697 
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmark.h 2d06120 
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmark.cc beb82db 
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkdialog.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkdialog.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkdialog_p.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkdombuilder.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkdombuilder.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkexporter.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter_ie.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter_ie.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter_ns.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter_ns.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter_opera.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter_opera.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkimporter_opera_p.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkmanager.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkmanager.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkmanageradaptor.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkmanageradaptor_p.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkmenu.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkmenu.cc  
>   kio/bookmarks/kbookmarkmenu_p.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/konqbookmarkmenu.h  
>   kio/bookmarks/konqbookmarkmenu.cc  
>   kio/tests/CMakeLists.txt e9e7265 
>   kio/tests/kbookmarkdialogtest.cpp  
>   kio/tests/kbookmarktest.h  
>   kio/tests/kbookmarktest.cpp  
>   staging/CMakeLists.txt 1602d95 
>   staging/kbookmarks/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   staging/kbookmarks/autotests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   staging/kbookmarks/src/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
>   staging/kbookmarks/tests/CMakeLists.txt PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/112479/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> compiles  + test runs.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> David Edmundson
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130908/1117991f/attachment.html>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list