QUrl behavior and KIO

[Marco Martin]

On Thursday 05 September 2013, David Faure wrote:
> 
> See, you even knew that ;)
> 
> > what should be done? modify kio to make qurls without scheme work (and
> > assume they are file://) or modify all the users to make sure a scheme is
> > always passed?
> 
> Correct porting to QUrl is the only thing that makes sense IMHO.
> Let's not start adding hacks for badly ported code.

ok, i just wanted to make sure, since the autotest for the trash kioslave uses 
the wrong form all over the place, so i'll correct all there and in the kio 
itself

Cheers,
Marco Martin