Having a Tier 0 for cmake and git submodules

Dominik Haumann dhaumann at kde.org
Sun Nov 10 21:26:48 UTC 2013


On Sunday 10 November 2013 17:57:00 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Since there's been several times discussions about having a kind of "Tier 0"
> for building our frameworks containing what is right now in ECM kde-modules
> directory, but the idea was never really on the table because of the extra
> dependency it'd bring, I looked a bit at the git submodule option to get
> there.
> 
> The motivation for going with a git submodule is that it would allow such a
> Tier 0 to be completely transparent to third parties who would want to grab
> a Tier 1 framework and not bother about installing anything else than our
> main dependencies (namely Qt, CMake and ECM).
> 
> Again: If we force third parties to install another KDE specific dependency
> to build a Tier 1 framework from sources we failed.
> 
> So after playing a bit with several solutions (I looked at git subtree too
> for instance), I still think that git submodule is the solution to use if
> we got for such a Tier 0... it's not perfect though.
> 
> Indeed, submodules keep the information of the exact sha-1 used, there's no
> way to have them track a branch automatically. That's likely to turn into a
> problem (not for third parties this time but for our own developers) as from
> the master branch of a framework we probably always want the tipping point
> of the master branch of the repository containing the cmake files.
> 
> Also git archive ignores submodules when generating the archive... But
> that's easy to fix and there's a git archive-all script available which
> does the recursive export.
> 
> Now back to the submodules sha-1 update... The only thing I see to easily
> overcome that for our developers, is to have a hook, which would update the
> submodules for all the frameworks every time someone pushes in the tier 0
> repository. Is it something the sysadmins would agree to have on the server?
> 
> Any opinions or thoughts on that?
> 
> If we agree on the approach I think we have a potential solution for
> injecting a tier 0 in all our frameworks that could be put into place when
> we start splitting the repositories.
> 
> Regards.

I'm about to write a blog about Kate on 5. In that context, I've quickly 
created the frameworks 5 diagram with TikZ (I'm very much addicted to that).

Attached you can find the source code, along with the pdf file created by:

  pdflatex kf5.tex

Feel free to put that into git, if you want. I've added a tier 0 already.
There, Tier 0 is basically defined by everything that is a requirement to
the other tiers.

Greetings,
Dominik
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kf5.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 22392 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20131110/5b2c8cb0/attachment-0001.pdf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: kf5.tex
Type: text/x-tex
Size: 2786 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20131110/5b2c8cb0/attachment-0001.tex>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list