Review Request 113260: Port KTimeZoned to Qt5/KF5

[Martin Klapetek]

> On Nov. 4, 2013, 4:12 p.m., John Layt wrote:
> > I've asked on the Qt Development list about Qt 5 Solaris support.  I'm told it builds and works to some extent, and patches are welcome, but not without having been tested on a real Solaris build first, which I have no desire to do.  I don't think much is required, Solaris uses the Olsen tz files, just with different patches and possibly a different zonetab layout, but I don't want to code blind.  So we have two options, one is not worry about Solaris support for now, and if anyone (Ade?) complains then ask them to contribute upstream (with my help).  The alternative is to keep the Solaris code in ktimezoned, including calls to return the current system time zone and the list of available time zones, and on other platforms just wrap the Qt calls.  Opinions?
> 
> John Layt wrote:
>     s/patches/paths

I'd like to reiterate the (imho) bigger issue here - there's no effort at all to have KF5 and/or PW2 running on Solaris (unlike the Windows effort), so I wouldn't push it (only) to the smallest component in the workspace, it makes no sense at this time.


- Martin


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/#review42961
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Oct. 22, 2013, 4:49 p.m., Martin Klapetek wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Oct. 22, 2013, 4:49 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Runtime, KDE Frameworks, Plasma, and John Layt.
> 
> 
> Repository: kde-runtime
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Originally I wanted to port KTimeZoned 1:1 to Qt5/KF5, but then I found out that all the stuff KTZD was doing was added in QTimeZone, that includes reading correct system files/env variables to obtain the timezone and returning the proper system zone (KTZD did all this by itself). It also doesn't need to parse the timezone files itself or watch for their changes as QTimeZone objects are not stored.
> 
> So now it's just a thin module watching /etc/timezone (used by Debian-based distros) and /etc/localtime (used by eg. Fedora or Suse, but also by Debian in conjunction with /etc/timezone) for changes and if it detects a change, it checks if the new timezone is really different and if it is, it sends out a DBus signal "timeZoneChange". I changed it from "configChanged" as I think "timeZoneChanged" makes way more sense.
> 
> I didn't touch the Windows part as I have no way to test, would be nice if someone could help with that.
> 
> EDIT: I removed the other two DBus signals which were not used and I'm unsure KTZD is the correct place for that now anyway. The only usage in KSystemTimeZone can be replaced by own KDirWatch instance.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt a5ec93d 
>   ktimezoned/CMakeLists.txt bafc85e 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezoned.h ff21807 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezoned.cpp f380c09 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezoned_win.h 26e21cc 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezoned_win.cpp cadfe3a 
>   ktimezoned/ktimezonedbase.h ca00aca 
>   ktimezoned/org.kde.KTimeZoned.xml daaa0b7 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113260/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Tested by changing the timezone in different ways, change was detected and signalled out.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Martin Klapetek
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20131104/e08575d1/attachment.html>