Fancy header policy

[Benjamin Port]

On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:15:52 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 July 2013 10:05:59 Benjamin Port wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 08:49:48 AM Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > > The ideal situation would be to get them generated, but I don't think
> > > anyone put the work in yet.
> > 
> > Yes, I think we need to find a way to generate fancy header. But we
> > probably need to have somewhere the header associated with the forwarding
> > header name. We can't generate a CamelCase name.
> 
> Actually I think we can. We need to extract the class names from the header
> files (in fact your proposal would break for headers containing several
> class names). syncqt in qtbase does something like that, we probably want
> an equivalent.
Yes good idea, I will looking to Qt and then try to do an equivalent. (If i 
have the knowledge to do that)	
> 
> Regards.

--
Benjamin Port