repository changes for plasma2/frameworks5

[Stephen Kelly]

Kevin Ottens wrote:

> On Monday 28 January 2013 18:54:12 Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> Marco Martin wrote:
>> > Most important, what is the less messy git way to do it?
>> 
>> As we discussed on IRC, it may be better to split plasma out into its own
>> repo now already, like we did with nepomuk.
> 
> OTOH, there's also reasons to not split too early. It depended on quite
> some stuff in other modules last I checked (could have changed), moving it
> to another repo that early means less eyeballs and build problems likely
> caught later.
> 

I don't know the latest on those dependencies either, but it doesn't really 
matter, does it? 

The problems will be caught whenever someone tries to build the external 
plasma repo and discovers they now need another include or whatever. Then it 
just depends on how often they update/build. People working on 
frameworks/plasma are not inexperienced newbies who don't know how to fix 
minor issues like that (and I don't think we need to optimize for such 
newbies yet either). I'm sure it's fine.


Thanks,

Steve.