Review Request 108487: Make kjsembed build on Qt5 rather than on Qt4

[Stephen Kelly]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108487/#review25865
-----------------------------------------------------------



kjsembed/kjsembed/slotproxy.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108487/#comment19738>

    Is this the common way to get at that stuff now? In Qt itself I mean.


- Stephen Kelly


On Jan. 19, 2013, 10:29 p.m., Jon Severinsson wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108487/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 19, 2013, 10:29 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for KDE Frameworks.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> As we are dropping Qt4 support, it's time to port the last pieces of Qt4 only code, even if that makes it Qt5 only...
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 0a67fe8 
>   kjsembed/kjsembed/kjsembed.cpp 5dfa804 
>   kjsembed/kjsembed/slotproxy.cpp 59b29d2 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108487/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jon Severinsson
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130120/41d384d6/attachment.html>