lib or lib64?

[David Faure]

On Friday 15 February 2013 21:14:28 Christoph Feck wrote:
> On Friday 15 February 2013 16:26:38 Treeve Jelbert wrote:
> > $ ls /opt/qt5/lib64
> > cmake                                libphonon4qt5.so.4
> > libstreamanalyzer.so.0.7.8
> > libattica.so                         libphonon4qt5.so.4.6.60
> > libstreams.so
> > libattica.so.0.4                     libsearchclient
> > libstreams.so.0
> > libattica.so.0.4.1                   libsearchclient.so
> > libstreams.so.0.7.8
> 
> Not answering your question, but shouldn't Qt 5 versions use a
> different .so number? They aren't binary compatible, after all.

Excellent point. Yes.

I added the Qt5 support into strigi and attica and other deps without talking 
to maintainers though, so I have no idea how they want to number their stuff...

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Sponsored by BlueSystems and KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks