"kde5" or "kf5" ?
Kevin Ottens
ervin+bluesystems at kde.org
Sat Feb 16 09:49:11 UTC 2013
On Saturday 16 February 2013 10:31:38 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK KDE based on KDE frameworks will not be KDE 5, but still KDE4.
>
> So... I noticed that we install some things to directories containing "kf5",
> e.g.
> _set_fancy(PLUGIN_INSTALL_DIR "${QT_PLUGIN_INSTALL_DIR}/kf5")
>
> but several other things to "kde5":
> set(BUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR "/Applications/KDE5")
> _set_fancy(LIBEXEC_INSTALL_DIR "${LIB_INSTALL_DIR}/kde5/libexec")
> _set_fancy(XDG_APPS_INSTALL_DIR "${SHARE_INSTALL_PREFIX}/applications/kde5"
> )
>
> I think this should be consistent, either "kf5" (which looses the KDE in it)
> or "kde5".
I remember having that discussion with David at some point, if I manage to
retranscribe the conclusion properly, it was something along the lines of:
* If that's where we install parts of the frameworks or runtime dependencies
of frameworks it should say kf5;
* If that's where we install application parts or metadata it should say
kde5.
So in your example above the use of kf5 vs kde5 doesn't bother me much except
for probably libexec which is likely about runtime dependencies of frameworks.
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
Sponsored by BlueSystems and KDAB to work on KDE Frameworks
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20130216/6847063c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list