Let's get in release mode!

[Kevin Ottens]

On Tuesday 17 December 2013 11:32:46 Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 11:17:35 +0100, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Dec 2013 18:17:59 +0100, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> >>> Regarding the split: what is going to happen to the frameworks
> >>> branch of the
> >>> kdelibs repository after the split? Is it going to be removed or is
> >>> it
> >>> going to stay there with the framework folders pointing to the
> >>> framework
> >>> repositories through git sub-modules? The work on the graph
> >>> generator and
> >>> api.kde.org will be different depending on what the branch becomes.
> >> 
> >> Consider it removed from the graph generator pov. Technically it'll
> >> stay but
> >> will be frozen (no push allowed).
> > 
> > Do you have a plan to indicate which tier a framework belongs to? My
> > kf5dot tool relies on folder names right now, but it's not going to
> > work
> > anymore. I am thinking there should be either a standard
> > meta-information file in the root of each framework repository, or a
> > standard variable set within CMake which we can grep out (a bit
> > ugly).
> 
> Replying to myself: I think using DOAP files [1] would provide a place
> to store this (through an extension) and other information like
> licenses and maintainers.

That's an option. We could also see if we could make inqlude.org job easier, I 
guess it uses a similar input format too.

Cheers.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20131217/15099056/attachment.sig>