Tracking bugs in Frameworks

[David Faure]

On Saturday 14 December 2013 19:00:04 Frank Reininghaus wrote:
> IMHO, it would be much more transparent for bug triagers, developers,
> and users if there was a nice 1:1 correspondence between the split
> repositories/frameworks and the bugzilla products. One could argue
> that each repository could also be a "component" of the product
> "Frameworks", but this would remove the option to define more
> fine-grained "components" for a particular framework (e.g., the
> current product "kfile" has some different components for different
> parts of that library).

I agree, it's the right time to make this cleaner.

> Maybe one could create a bugzilla product for each "Framework" (unless
> the product exists already, like kio). One could set up a version
> "frameworks" in each of them as long as the frameworks don't have
> proper versions yet.

I disagree with a "frameworks" version. In 2 years, how will we distinguish 
which version of KF5 that is? 

The version should be 5.0, instead (matching "@since" tags and .so version 
numbers).

Or maybe 4.9.90 for now, if you want.

-- 
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5