Suggestion: create an own framework for KGlobalAccel

[Martin Graesslin]

Hi,

at the moment KGlobalAccel is part of XmlGui which I consider semantically 
wrong. Global shortcuts have nothing to do with XmlGui and there are quite 
some examples for applications which need global shortcuts but do not use xml 
gui (e.g. everything in the desktop shell).

My suggestion is to move the following source files into an own framework:
* kglobalaccel.cpp
* kglobalaccel.h
* kglobalaccel_p.h
* kglobalshortcutinfo.cpp
* kglobalshortcutinfo.h
* kglobalshortcutinfo_dbus.cpp
* kglobalshortcutinfo_p.h
* org.kde.kglobalaccel.Component.xml
* org.kde.KGlobalAccel.xml

From checking the source files this would become a tier1 framework as the 
dependencies are:
* QtCore
* QtDBus
* QtWidgets
* QtX11Extras

Opinions?

Cheers
Martin

P.S. I blame Aurélien and his diagrams for this proposal. It made me look into 
the dependencies of KWin and I had a "wtf why are we linking sonnet?" moment 
and looked into what we used of XmlGui.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20131208/9068058c/attachment.sig>