Review Request: Port some uses of KProcess to QProcess
David Faure
faure at kde.org
Sat Sep 22 10:42:26 UTC 2012
On Thursday 20 September 2012 22:02:03 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> ed71a84ca2178 is arguably broken.
>
> yes. a rather suboptimal replacement. before you ask, search the core-devel
> archive shortly before the time the new kprocess was added.
I can't do *everything* in the KDE Frameworks 5 effort.
Both QProcess and KProcess are mostly your code, aren't they?
How about you fix QProcess then, if you consider it suboptimal?
--
David Faure, faure at kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5
More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel
mailing list