KArchive design changes

[Kevin Ottens]

On Monday 24 September 2012 08:49:56 Pier Luigi wrote:
> I will use it of course, maintaining code already available in a larger
> codebase is not an option I would totally avoid it, although I hope it will
> go in Qt 5.1+ because otherwise I will have to make my own github repo
> with a copy of it.

I can't predict the future, but still, I doubt it will go in Qt itself to be 
honest. I don't see why that would force you to make your own github 
repository and your own copy though.
 
> What's you plan for pushing more kdelibs stuff in Qt 5.x guys?

That's mainly about adding a class here and there, or contributing features 
and fixes in existing classes at that point. There's no plan for complete 
libraries (it's in fact very expensive as it basically means a rewrite because 
of legal reasons).

There might be exceptions of course.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20121012/57c70f0b/attachment.sig>